All episodes

This marketing approach, which evolved from the 1980s, uses push and pull techniques to target both B2B and B2C markets. While it offers benefits like price premiums and market power, it also poses risks such as dependency on OEM quality. This episode distinguish ingredient branding from co-branding and highlight the importance of material relevance, consumer visibility, and strategic labelling for success. It also dives into the concept of inverse ingredient branding where the OEM promotes the component.

Drawing upon a 2015 academic study on brand identity and a 2024 legal analysis of trademark risk using examples like Nescafé and Tate & Lyle's Golden Syrup, they explain how elements such as packaging, messaging, and logos contribute to consumer perception. This episode stress the importance of trademark clearance and retaining distinctive brand components to avoid legal issues and loss of equity. A five-step roadmap is offered, integrating identity audits, legal screening, design testing, phased rollout, and IP protection, demonstrating that successful rebranding requires coordination between marketing, design, legal, and consumer insights.

This kickoff episode of our Personal Growth series explores how intellectual property experts can use digital marketing to build visibility, credibility, and influence. In a world where professional relevance is increasingly shaped online, having a strong digital presence is no longer optional—it’s essential. You'll learn why platforms like LinkedIn matter, how to position your expertise, and what tools and techniques help IP professionals stay visible and valuable in a digital-first environment.
Whether you're just getting started or looking to refine your strategy, this episode helps you understand the mindset and methods behind effective digital marketing—tailored specifically for the IP field....

It emphasises that a robust IP portfolio, encompassing patents, trademarks, and trade secrets, acts as a competitive advantage, or "moat". The text explains how to showcase market exclusivity, brand loyalty, and innovation leadership through IP protection. Using Stripe as a case study, the author illustrates how a combination of different IP types contributes to a defensible market position and secures investment. Ultimately, the piece advises startups to strategically leverage and clearly communicate the value of their IP to potential funders.

Stephen Key emphasised that understanding business objectives should precede patenting, urging inventors to align their patent claims with their commercial goals. Key stressed the importance of testing market demand for an invention's benefit before heavily investing in IP protection. He also highlighted the collaborative role of inventors and IP experts, where inventors should actively contribute their business acumen to the patenting process, ensuring the protection truly serves their needs. Key enthusiastically endorsed provisional patent applications as an accessible starting point for securing intellectual property rights while further developing an invention.

Novak, with a background in economics, finance, and software, recounts his entry into IP tech through developing an AI-powered patent retrieval system. The discussion further investigates the challenges startups face in engaging with the IP system and how digital tools, like Novak's, can lower these barriers by offering user-friendly initial engagement and fostering trust, ultimately aiming to improve the client journey for patent law firms.

Koukounis emphasises the often-overlooked value of incremental improvements and advocates for closer collaboration between engineers and IP departments to identify and protect these innovations through patents. The discussion uses the example of modified excavator teeth to illustrate how strategic IP design can secure market advantages. Ultimately, the piece argues for a shift in perspective where IP is viewed as a strategic business asset rather than just a cost, requiring better understanding at the executive level and encouragement of inventive thinking among engineers.

Drawing upon Robert G. Cooper's work, this episode presents the stage-gate system as a structured method to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of new product development. The stage-gate approach divides the innovation process into distinct stages separated by decision points called gates, involving multidisciplinary teams and senior management. Key benefits highlighted include enhanced quality, stronger market focus, better preliminary work, and more robust project evaluations. Ultimately, the piece argues that adopting a stage-gate system offers a competitive advantage by providing a clear roadmap and improving the success rate of new products.

This episode outlines key areas of concern, including copyright and software protection, industrial property and patent protection, data protection and ownership, and cybersecurity threats. The discussion emphasises the complexities of balancing open-source initiatives with proprietary IP and highlights LESI's role in addressing these issues. Future directions for IP in smart cities, such as the growing importance of data and AI-related IP, are also considered.

Utterback and Suárez's analysis highlights a recurring pattern across industries: an initial period of diverse experimentation, the emergence of a dominant design shaped by various factors, a peak in the number of firms, a subsequent shakeout, and eventual market stabilisation with a few key players. This episode emphasises that understanding this pattern is crucial for firms deciding on market entry timing and for policymakers aiming to foster innovation. It also touches upon factors beyond technology that influence dominant design and differences observed between US and Japanese industry evolution.